|
Procrastination'R'us It's time I got my act together. In the living room we have: 5 heaped boxes of ironing awaiting to be tackled. They have been waiting for the past few weeks I am sure a few more days won't hurt. A number of maps, some OHP pens, some acetates. Those routes aren't gonna check themselves girl. 1 crochet UFO 3 knitting UFOs Some unfinished bobbin lace, a number of embroidery UFOs, an unfinished patchwork quilt. A number of books, mostly unread or abandoned. 1 pile of clothes needing repairs or adjusting of some kind or other. Empty photo albums and photo frames. I will get round to printing them someday. Some empty boxes, cut out bits of aluminium can and a can of flat black spray paint for a project I intended to have a go at with The Boy but now can't be bothered to even start. Some scoubidou wires. The garden has a neglected look about it. The usual mess has increased to chaotique proportions. I could have been dealing any of the above tonight, instead I made belgian waffles with the new toy the postman delivered at work this morning. Any excuse. |
|
|
22.7.05 22:44 |
|
|
Something for everybody, even civilians Yesterday Annie Mole and I met in Hammersmith to attend the Open Tech '05 event. Hold on I hear you say, you don't know your /bin from your /sbin and your / from your /usr so what on earth were you doing at a series of lectures and seminars organised by Unix Users? Well, it is true that I felt more than slightly outgeeked even as I was walking through the door but not all of the talks were aimed at techies. We split up for the first session, Annie chose the seminar on Practical Open Content while I went to Danny O'Brien's lecture on Living life in Public and very interesting and entertaining it was too. It's a shame Geoff could not make it as the subject of data asymetry (ie "they know you, but you don't know them") has cropped up recently in conversation and in his posts. We met again for the second session and decided to go for the seminar on media hacking. which was pitched at a technical knowledge level higher than what I possess so most of it passed me by (with hinsight I should have gone to Ted Nelson's lecture and found out more about transliterature instead - my fault for not doing my homework and checking out the speakers' websites beforehand). First of was a demonstration of how one can put Linux on an iPod. First I thought, why would I want to do that? Then Matt Westcott showed the that it allowed for a talking display so I thought "ah there is a point to this", increased accessibility and a nice feature if you want to navigate without having to take the iPod out of your pocket. Unfortunately, I won't be doing that in a hurry since however good the idea is, the implementation has a slight disadvantage... it stops MP3s from playing properly. Hacking iTunes and Kamelia completely passed me by. Myth TV was an interesting concept but since I have never felt strongly enough about missing a TV programme to go to the effort of recording it I probably won't be using it just yet. Him Indoors on the other hand... After lunch we went to hear about Social factors and Usability. We found out more about My Society and about the sort of constraints which present themselves when building a site like Write To Them (which allows people to contact their elected representatives electronically) from avoiding spamming MPs to ensuring the electoral boundries are accurate. We also found out about how much feedback the BBC received when they tinkered with their homepage and how they incorporated it to subsequent changes to successfully decrease the number of complaints. I am sure I didn't give the talk on the Glastonbury website the attention it deserved (sorry). Next we went to hear "the Future is Open [or should be]". The key words APIs, microformats and tags. Tags were a fairly present topic on the day and mentioned at almost every session either by the speakers or the attendees in their questions. Karl has written about the subject recently so if you want to find out more about it you could do a lot worse than reading his post on ontology, thesaurus, taxonomy and Websemantics or the later one on tags, taxonomy and Dot Clear (the posts themselves are in French but the links at the bottom of each post take you to articles in English if you struggle with French). For the last 2 sessions we chose "Blogs and Social Software" and "Web Services" (I had originaly planned to go the lecture on BBC R&D to find out more about Dirac but the Media Hacking session in the morning gave me an idea it might be too technical for me to get much from it). My favourite talks for the rest of the day were: Tom Reynold's Blogging without losing your job (more kittens would make it even better I feel); surprisingly since I don't watch Big Brother Paul Mutton's talk about building graphic representation to represent the social interactions in the house (hadn't heard of heuristics since University, it made me all nostalgic for the days when I used more than 2 braincells at a time); the presentation of the next project in the pipeline by the people who built Who Should you Vote For? which is going to suggest which book people may like to read next based on the user's ideal library (includes weightings so that not everybody ends up being suggested Harry Potter or the Da Vinci Code); Gavin Bell's talk on his Social Documents project which spurred on from Eurotalk (if you like to read and like commenting on books then do go and have a look at his site. Gavin is looking for volunteers/contributors to help build virtual magic) and lastly the enthusiastic show of what Greasemonkey can do (nice applications in terms of accessibility). To round up we went to the bar of course. Quote of the day "The problem with books is there's no plugins" (by a delegate so unattributed); the smile on his face said it all - who said geeks dont have a sense of humour? |
|
|
24.7.05 14:43 |
|
|
My baby boy is going away tomorrow There
My mum brought
I had a couple of local options up
Tomorrow they will be leaving after lunch and by mid-afternoon I'll probably be missing The Boy already. |
|
|
27.7.05 23:47 |
|
|
Must be my accent "... if we run out I can always improvise, there's always Jag's recipe for kidney bean curry." There's a slightly puzzled and slighty horrified look on Him Indoors' face. "I heard kitty meat curry, It's not what you meant is it?" |
|
|
30.7.05 20:38 |
|
|
Even on-line you can have an Ikea moment The aim - finding out if Ikea's wooden venitian blinds are cheaper than the ones in the local shop and if they are available in a size which fits The Boy's window before we treck round the North Circular and endure the madness that is the Ikea store in Wembley. Ikea don't do online ordering but you can have a look at the products from the comfort of your own sofa. The theory is good. The reality less so. Only Ikea would have a website esigned to drive the visitors nuts in the same way its shop does. Talk about consistency of approach to customer service. Here we go, there is a list of categories on the left, nothing that screams blinds but Textiles might be a good option, hurrah the next screen gives the option of "Curtains and Blinds". So far fairly painless, only after clicking on the option and trying out the 4 pages of products not a blind in sight. Ok, lets try a different way. Search box. I tried "wooden blind" - no match; "venitian blind" - still no match; "blind" - 2 results: a teddy bear called Blund and a bit of blurb on accessibility to the blind. Not quite what I was after. Product listing A-Z no blind under the letter B. The wooden venitian blinds are listed under the letter L of course (for Lindmon). Now why did I not think of that? </sarcasm> What sort of a person sets up a website with a search facility which only looks up products by their own brand name? One working for ikea of course. Surely only somebody who has the catalogue would look up the product by their Ikea name and if they have the catalogue then they are unlikely to look it up on the website since you can't order online and the information on the site is identical to that in the catalogue. Then again maybe it's just me failing to embrace the Ikea philosophy. |
|
|
31.7.05 19:21 |
|
[first page] [previous page]
